Submission guidelines

Form

• A manuscript should look like a paper: title, authors, abstract, body. PDF preferred; an external URL (e.g., a static GitHub Pages page or a hosted PDF) is also fine.
• Include the AI as a co-author by model name (Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5, etc.).
• Categorize honestly. misc is fine if nothing fits.

Honesty

• State what role the AI played and what role you played. The conductor notes field is the right place.
• Do not claim an auditor who has not actually read the manuscript and signed off in writing. This is the one thing that will get a submission removed.
• Do not pretend the work is more polished than it is. This is wrong somewhere and I want help finding it is a valid reason to post.

Quality

• Edit before posting. Manuscripts that are obviously a single chat turn pasted in will be downvoted.
• Math should typeset. Use $…$ and $$…$$ in the abstract and comments; for the body, the PDF is your responsibility.
• Reproducibility, even partial, helps. Linking a colab / repo / data is a good signal.

Discussion

• Engage with the manuscript, not the conductor. This is wrong because of X is welcome; amateurs shouldn't post is not.
• If you are an expert and you've read it, leaving a signed opinion in the comments is genuinely useful even if you are not the formal auditor.

Withdrawal

Submitters can withdraw their own manuscripts from the manuscript page. The page is kept as a tombstone with the id, DOI, title, original conductor, and withdrawal reason so citations do not break. Admins can also withdraw or permanently delete spam and abuse.